| Question
#1 | Ken
Cockrell's Reply | |
From:
Marcie Butcher from Marion, Ind.,
age 47 To:
Commander
Kenneth Cockrell
Question:
I understand Flight Dynamics 101, but I want to know the
actual process that takes place when the orbiter does the ˝ roll
after clearing the tower during the launch. What all has to take
place for this event to take place?
Cockrell:
First of all, the reason for the roll is because we use the Apollo
launch pads for shuttle operations. And because of the way the
Apollo launch pads were constructed, the space shuttle has to
be on the launch pad with the back of it basically facing south.
And because we fly uphill inverted, we have to roll around to
get the back of the vehicle pointed in the direction we want to
go for ascent. The actual process that happens is the flight control
computers, or the flight control portion of the computers, commands
the roll and the roll is caused by the gimbaling of the solid
rocket motor nozzles as well as the shuttle main engine nozzles.
They move very slightly on their gimbals and create the rolling
moment force that is used to roll the vehicle around. It is quite
a fantastic feeling inside because besides rolling it gives you
a yawing feeling because we are above the axis of roll in the
cockpit. So it gives you a good swing around. And then when the
roll is complete it usually over shoots a little bit and comes
back and so it sort of feels like you are on the end of a rope
being swung around and it is a lot of fun.
| 
| | Question
#2 | Ken
Cockrell's Reply | |
From:
Howard Leeming from Poulsbo,
Wash., age: 37 To:
Commander
Kenneth Cockrell
Question:
Why switch to manual control of the shuttle on descent
for the landing? Why not use the computers to handle the task?
It is done on commercial airliners and military planes, and it
removes any chance of human error.
Cockrell:
We get asked this
question quite often. There is quite a bit difference between
a space shuttle landing and that of an airplane, whether it's
commercial or military. Airplanes have the ability for the pilot
to take over, and make a misapproach if anything goes wrong or
if they see any equipment malfunctions on the autoland systems.
In fact I have flown quite a few automatic landings to aircraft
carriers and it is true the automatic landing systems usually
make very precise landings. However it is also true that sometimes
they don't. Some little thing may go wrong or some sensor may
provide an input to the system that gives you a little bit of
a scary ride. And it is nice to be able to take over disconnect
the autopilot portion, add power and go around. That is something
that we can't do on the shuttle. In fact during testing of the
autoland system using our shuttle airplanes which model the behavior
of the shuttle, we found that there are some fairly large dispersions
between the planned touch down air speed and the touch down air
speed the autoland actually accomplishes and because we are landing
very close to the limit speed for our main gear tires we really
can't handle those kinds of dispersions. So, over the years the
program has come to the decision that it's best to let the pilots
actually make the landing for two reasons. One is we can't make
a go around if there is a system problem with the autoland. And
the second one being that we actually can do a slightly better
job at controlling the touch down air speed, which is important
for the main tires. So for the foreseeable future or at least
with the current autoland system we plan to land it manually.
That happens to be good news for the pilots because we enjoy doing
that.
| 
| | Question
#3 | Ken
Cockrell's Reply | |
From:
Carron Schweiger from De Pere,
Wis., age: 20 To:
Commander
Kenneth Cockrell
Question:
I am in the elementary/middle school education program
at St. Norbert College, De Pere, Wis. Our project for this semester
is to teach a 10-week unit on the space station/space travel to
a group of sixth-graders. One of the questions our group has is
how do the shuttles get back to the Earth? For example, when they
lift off, there is fuel and whatever else to get them started.
But how do they get that boost or whatever is needed to get back
here?
Cockrell:
We do have
a lot more fuel when we lift off, fuel that provides power to
the main engines and also the boosters are filled with solid rocket
fuel. But on board the shuttle there is quite a bit of fuel that
we use for maneuvering in orbit, including raising and lowering
our orbit. Returning to Earth is simply a matter of reducing your
speed. You don't have to reduce it very much either. Something
around the order of about 180 to 200 miles per hour reduction
of speed, is enough to make you lower the orbit to the point where
it'll descend into the upper reaches of the atmosphere and then
the drag from the atmosphere allows us to slow down and also change
our path and move from left and right to aim directly at the landing
site, and we can control ourselves with the atmosphere. But, the
answer to the question is that we just use some of the fuel that
we saved for the end of the mission to reduce the orbit speed
just a slight amount and that causes us to drop out of orbit and
into the Earth's atmosphere.
| 
| | Question
#4 | Mark
Polansky's
Reply | |
From:
Mike from Smyrna, Del., age:
14 To:
Pilot
Mark Polansky
Question:
My class just did a little report on what it would be like to
be part of the crew for a space shuttle or space station, and
I figured I would ask the experts. What is it like to work in
a gravity free environment?
Polansky:
Being a new guy I will say it is just utterly fantastic, and there
are some differences of course. You float around a lot and the
new fliers sometimes go a little bit too fast, maybe you bump
off a wall or two. So you need to go slowly and you need to hold
onto things and use your hands and feet to sort of keep you in
place while you are doing work. On the other hand it's a lot easier
to work in space because you can get into lots of places you can't
get on the ground because you can work in any orientation whether
it is right side up, upside down or sideways. And so that makes
our task of building the space station and working inside the
lab a lot easier as we are trying to get tools in place. So there
are pluses and minuses about being in zero g for work but as far
as the experience it's just wonderful.
| 
| | Question
#5 | Ken
Cockrell's Reply | |
From:
Zack from Atlanta, Ga., age:
5 To:
Commander
Kenneth Cockrell
Question:
I got a blue "flight suit" at Kennedy Space Center. Do astronauts
wear flight suits like mine? Do they get a new patch for every
flight?
Cockrell:
Well, first of all we do wear flight suits similar to the one
you purchased. We wear them to fly in the T-38 airplanes which
we use to keep us proficient as pilots and as crewmembers in between
our space flights. And, yes, we do get a new patch for every flight.
In fact, the crew has a hand in designing the patch, and we put
pictures and emblems on the patch that are significant to what
we will be doing on that flight, and usually the patch carries
our names on it. And we're usually very proud of the patches that
we design, and we wear them on our blue flight suits when we go
flying in T-38s, and we also have a copy of the patch on most
of our flight data file, our checklist, and the patch is there
also on our space suits that we go space walking in, and also
the orange suits that we use for take off and landing in the shuttle.
| 
| | Question
#6 | Ken
Cockrell's Reply | |
From:
Greggory Blunt from Memphis,
Tenn., age: 30 To:
Commander
Kenneth Cockrell
Question:
Congratulations on a model launch of Space Shuttle Atlantis. It
was a sight to see. Can you say how soon Destiny will be fully
operational?
Cockrell:
As you probably know, Greg, we brought up just the minimum number
of racks needed to provide environmental control and also attitude
control in Destiny. And the next two flights will bring a total
of 11 more racks, bringing the number to 16 that will be installed
in Destiny. The laboratory holds 23 racks. There are slots for
24 but one of the spaces has a window in it so we're not going
to put a rack there. And as each flight comes up, there will be
a greater capability installed in Destiny. By Flight 6A, we'll
be running the Space Station robot arm from inside the lab at
what's called the Robotics Workstation, and then also science
will have begun and the medical facility will have been installed
by that flight, and subsequent flights will bring more and more
science. The concept of Destiny is one of adaptability and change,
and you'll see racks being traded out and maybe not always the
full complement of racks aboard. It just depends on what research
is scheduled at which time and what missions they can be fit on,
so you'll see the science complement of Destiny changing, and
the type of research that's done on board the laboratory changing.
| 
| | Question
#7 | Tom
Jones'
Reply | |
From:
Alex
Miller from Moss Beach, Calif., age: 13 To:
Mission
Specialist Tom Jones
Question:
Tom Jones, you met my father when we were living in Baltimore.
His name is John Miller, who used to be the former baseball broadcaster
for the Baltimore Orioles. I am extremely interested in pretty
much anything at all about space, and in the future, I am greatly
hoping to become an astronaut myself. The question that I want
to know is what sensations do you feel when you exit the space
shuttle or space station for an EVA? Do you feel a sensation of
vertigo, a sensation of awe looking back at the beautiful sight
of Earth, or frightened at the reality that you are floating in
the vacuum of space?
Jones:
I didn't feel a sense of vertigo when I went outside on our EVA.
But, I did sometimes feel after working in someplace for a few
minutes that I had a sensation of disorientation. Not knowing
which way was port or starboard, or which way was back to the
orbiter hatch, which way was to the front of the space station.
That's just because you get turned around while working and especially
when it is dark it is hard to locate yourself. So, you have to
take a moment to look around and reorient. You do have a stupendous
view of the Earth, it is much better out of the helmet than inside
the orbiter, just because the window frames are not in view and
your helmet permits you to see almost a full 180 degrees from
side to side. And, I wasn't frightened at being in the vacuum
because the spacesuit is a superb little spaceship in itself.
And it protects you from micrometeoroids and extremes in temperature
outside and of course keeps the pressure next to your body so
that you can breath and maintain the workload that you're keeping
up with outside. Thanks.
| 
| | Question
#8 | Ken
Cockrell's Reply | |
From:
Jacco van Schaik from Almere,
The Netherlands, age: 35 To:
Commander
Kenneth Cockrell
Question:
I have a couple of questions about the re-entry procedure.
How far ahead of the landing site do you start the retros? How
long do you burn them? What's the delta-v resulting from the burn?
Cockrell:
Actually, we
don't have separate engines called retros; we use sort of multi-purpose
engines known as the orbital maneuvering system engines. They're
used for everything from a little bit of assist during ascent
to the rendezvous burns that we conduct to adjust our orbit to
enable us to rendezvous with another space craft such as International
Space Station. And we use them also for deorbit. The only difference
is that we turn around and face backwards and fire them in reverse.
The burn usually lasts about three minutes, somewhere between
two minutes and 50 seconds and three minutes and 20 seconds or
so, and the change in velocity is very small compared to our 17,500
miles per hour. We probably change our speed…the number is usually
on the order of 300 to 330 or so feet per second, which is maybe
250 miles per hour or about 350 kilometers per hour. So it's not
a very big change in velocity at all; it's just a slight amount
that causes us to drop a little bit lower in the orbit and for
the atmosphere to capture us and bring us down to Earth.
| 
| | Question
#9 | Tom
Jones'
Reply | |
From:
Remy
Autz from White Bear Lake, Minn., age: 32 To:
Mission
Specialist Tom Jones
Question:
How long do the astronauts usually wait to go on a space walk
to prevent getting sick in their space suits?
Jones:
We usually wait on the basis of our experience till the third
day of a flight to conduct the space walk. It's not because of
nausea because we have medicines that can take care of that, but
your head is usually somewhat congested for the first few days
after launch. As the fluid in your lower body, your legs, shifts
to your chest and head and that makes your sinuses clog and that
can present a problem when you repressurize to cabin pressure
after a space walk. The lower pressure in the spacesuit comes
up to cabin pressure, and it can cause some ear pain or sinus
pain if you don't have good breathing passages and sinus passages.
And that is why we wait for the third day of a mission to conduct
our space walk, at least.
| 
| | Question
#10 | Robert
Curbeam's
Reply | |
From:
Jake
Davenport from Des Plaines, Ill., age: 28
To: Mission
Specialist Robert Curbeam
Question:
I have wondered about this for the past 15 years and have yet
to find an answer anywhere: What is the effect of lighting a match
in zero gravity? My assumption is that it would form a "ball"
of flame. Is this true, and why or why not?
Curbeam:
Well, Jake, I have never lit a match in zero gravity because that's
not allowed here. But, I can tell you what happens when you light
a fire, because on my last flight we had a fire, a controlled
fire, on one of our experiments, and what happened is it does
form a ball of flame. But, because convection depends on gravity
it burns for a very short time and it burns very, very hot and
burns up all the oxygen around it very quickly and then goes out.
| 
| |
|
|